You are here: Home > More Info > Research Papers > Livestock > Poultry > Effect of Effective Microorganisms (EM®) on the Growth Parameters of Fayoumi and Horro Chicken

Effect of Effective Microorganisms® (EM®) on the Growth Parameters of Fayoumi and Horro Chicken

International Journal of Poultry Science 10 (3): 185-188, 2011 ISSN 1682-8356© Asian Network for Scientific Information, 2011

1Poultry Research, Agricultural Research Center, P.O. Box 32, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia

2Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 34, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia

3International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, P.O. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

The study was conducted to determine growth promoter effects of Effective Microorganisms (EM) on Horro and Fayoumi chickens. This study was conducted at Agricultural Research Center and National Veterinary Institute (Debre Zeit). A total of 450 chickens (225 from each breed) were used in this study. Birds were grouped according to treatment groups: EM-treated (with feed, with water, with feed and water) and non-treated (only SRBC treated and Non-EM, Non-SRBC) controls. EM was given daily from the 3rd week of age for 5 weeks. Daily feed intake and weekly body weight measurements were made. The finding shows that: (1) EM supplementation had no observable effect on mortality, weight gain and FCR in both breeds but Fayoumi had inherently higher body weight than Horro. This study did not consider the cellular arm of the immune response and EM response to infections with specific pathogens was not investigated, collectively demanding further research in these and other issues if EM has to be used as good feed additive.

Key words: Effective microorganism, Horro, Fayoumi, growth parameters, hummoral response

Corresponding Author: D. Tadelle, International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, P.O. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 185

Poultry rearing is considered to create rural employment, improve nutritional status of the people, generate family incomes and play a significant role in the social, cultural and religions lives of the society (Tadelle and Ogle, 2001; Halima et al., 2009). Despite the huge population and though poultry meat and eggs could be affordable sources of animal protein, the per capita egg and chicken meat consumption in Ethiopia are very low. Major problems in poultry production systems in this regard are disease, low nutrition, poor management and poor genetic performance (Tadelle and Ogle, 2001; Halima et al., 2009).

Available experimental data show that our indigenous birds have limited genetic capacity for both egg and meat production (Negussie, 1999). However, local chickens have several invaluable characteristics appropriate to traditional low input/low output farming systems, which are not found in any exotic breed. These allow them make the best use of locally available resources, hatch their own eggs, brood their offsprings and tolerate, at least to some extent, the common local poultry diseases (Tadelle, 2003).

Studies in other areas have already shown that the use of probiotics and Effective microorganisms could improve growth parameters: feed intake, weight gain, feed conversion ratio in Broilers (Chantsawang and Watcharangkul, 1999; ZuAnon et al., 1998; Patidar and Prajapati, 1999; Ergun et al., 2000; Kumprechtova et al., 2000; Safalaoh, 2006; Jagdish and Sen, 1993; Alvarez et al., 1994; Silva et al., 2000; Vicente et al., 2007; Higgins et al., 2007). But there are also studies which indicated that use of Probiotics and Effective Microorganisms did not bring positive or significant effect in broilers (Vicente et al., 2007; Samanta and Biswas, 1995; Gohain and Sapcota, 1998; Panda et al., 2000; Ergun et al., 2000; Mohit et al., 2007; Ahmad, 2004) with respect to growth parameters and mortality. This study was therefore conducted to study the effect of Effective Microorganisms on the growth parameters and mortality of Horro and Fayoumi chickens.

Study animals: 500 fresh and clean eggs of less than 7 days were selected from each of the parental groups (Fayoumi and Local Horro) and incubated. The eggs were hatched at the facility of the center strictly following standard hatchery practices. After the hatching, the chicks were checked for presence of any physical deformity that might later on affect the performance of the birds.

Housing and feeding of experimental chicks: All chicks were randomly assigned to experimental pens and reared in floor pens filled with hay as litter material with a density of 6 birds/meters square. The feed were formulated using appropriate feed formulation computer software (Feed-win). The birds were provided with a starter feed and water ad libitum till 8 weeks of age (end of experimental study). Standard bio-security protocol was employed throughout the experimental period; however, the chicks were not vaccinated for any of theprevalent diseases.

Supplementation of Effective Microorganisms (EM®):

The different EM preparations used in this study were made following the guidelines prepared by EM research organization (EMROSA, 2003). Birds were provided with EM with feed, with water or with feed and water daily starting from the age of 3 weeks till the end of the experiment (week 8). For this, 1% EM-Bokashi in feed was made for EM with feed, 0.1% EM-activated solution in water for EM in water and half of the above concentrations for EM supplemented in both feed and water. Control groups (F-NT-C, F-SRBC, H-NT-C and H- SRBC) did not receive EM.

Growth parameters and mortality: Data on the weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and mortality of chickens were weekly recorded starting from the 4th week of age till the end of the experiment. Body weight was taken by weighing birds of the same replication together and the average was taken as the weight of the group. Feed intake was determined by subtracting the weight of feed refused from that of feed offered for each replication and the average was taken for the group. Feed conversion ratio was determined as the ratio of the amount of feed consumed per weight gain. Mortality was recorded as it occurred.

Statistical analysis and model: The parameters including body weight gain, feed conversion ratio were monitored. All data were analyzed by ANOVA with the repeated model mixed procedure of SAS software (2000) and compared by least square means. Significance of observed mortality was tasted by chi-square statistics. Least square means were considered statistically different at p<0.05.

Growth parameters
Mortality: Mortality of Fayoumi and Horro chickens was recorded throughout the experimental period. There was no significant difference between breeds, between EM- treated and Non-treated controls and between the different modes of EM supplementation for each breed (Table 1).

Weight gain and FCR: The initial weight of chicks on week 4 (immediately before SRBC treatment) varied between individuals in different groups and the two breeds. Therefore, weight gain is presented by subtracting week 4 weight from measurements registered each week after SRBC treatment. Accordingly, in all treated and control groups weight gains show a general linear pattern (Fig. 1). The Fayoumi breed demonstrated significantly higher weight gain than the Horro for both treated and control groups (p<0.05). At week 8 (end of the experiment), supplementation of EM with water caused significantly lower weight gain than controls and other EM modes of supplementation in both breeds at p<0.05. On the other hand, the Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) showed no regular pattern and no significant variation between groups and between breeds was seen (Data not shown).

Age In Weeks

Fig. 1: Weekly weight gains (in grams) taking weight at week 4 as reference. Fayoumi (F) and Horro (H) chicken groups supplemented with EM in feed (EM-F), in water (EM-W), in feed and water (EM-FW), non-treated control (C) and SRBC groups are compared

Table 1: Experimental groups of Fayoumi and Horro chickens with different modes of EM treatment. Each group is composed of three replications of 15 birds

Experiement Groups with different modes of EM treatment

Table 2: Total observed mortality of Fayoumi and Horro chicken in different groups during the experimental period (week 4-8)

Group No. Chicks/group
No. Birds died
F-EM-F 45 2
F-EM-W 45 2
F-EM-FW 45 1
F-SRBC 45 6
F-NT-C 45 5
H-EM-F 45 4
H-EM-W 45 3
45 4
45 6
45 4

Effect of EM on growth parameters: The mortality rate was not improved after EM supplementation in both Fayoumi and Horro and breed difference was not significant. In agreement with our finding, Yoruk et al. (2004) found that mortality of hens fed with control diet was not different from those fed probiotic diets. During our study period, there was no outbreak of any known disease in which the effect of EM could have been tasted to arrive at a definitive conclusion. Therefore, it is only possible to say that it did not significantly reduce the effects of unidentified causes of mortality during the study period. On the contrary, other studies have shown that probiotics significantly reduced mortality in chickens (Vicente et al., 2007), Salmonella colonization in one day-old broiler chicks (Higgins et al., 2007) and mortality in turkeys (Vicente et al., 2007). The duration of the study may be one of many factors that may have caused differences between the results of ours and others. Recently, in a study in turkey poults with idiopathic diarrhea conducted by Higgins et al. (2007), administration of three doses of this probiotic culture was reported to improve body weight gain similar to the response obtained with therapeutic. Throughout the study period, Fayoumi chicks had higher gain in terms of weight than the Horro chicks. This was true both between treated groups and between control groups. Therefore, it seems that the difference between the two breeds is governed by inherent factors rather than due to the application of EM. The FCR was measured as the ratio of the amount of feed consumed per weight gain. There was no observable variation or appreciable pattern for FCR between breeds, between treatment groups within a breed and between EM treated and non-treated groups. Therefore, it appears that EM has little effect on FCR as both breeds have similar FCR at least during the early periods of their development. Feed conversion ratio as affected by probiotics is the subject of controversy. Similar to the present findings, several previous works suggested that supplementation of probiotics does not influence feed conversion ratio significantly or no such effect on FCR (Samanta and Biswas, 1995; Gohain and Sapcota, 1998; Panda et al., 2000; Ergun et al., 2000; Mohit et al., 2007; Ahmad, 2004). Similarly supplementation of probiotics had no effect on the performance of broiler chicks (ZuAnon et al., 1998; Patidar and Prajapati, 1999; Ergun et al., 2000; Kumprechtova et al., 2000). On the other hand, there are reports which state that EM fed birds had significantly higher weight gain and lower FCR than Non-EM groups (Safalaoh, 2006; Jagdish and Sen, 1993; Alvarez et al.,1994; Silva et al., 2000). EM supplementation had little effect on growth parameters such as weight gain, mortality and FCR. The difference in weight gain between Fyoumi and Horro appear to be due to breed difference rather than due to an EM effect. However, this study was conducted with limited number of chicks and with relatively young birds (less than two months of age). Therefore, to arrive at better understanding and conclusion on the role of EM and its future utilization in poultry farming the following points need to be addressed in future researches. As a novel area of research in our country, the findings of the present study are encouraging. However, it needs to be strengthened by similar works that involve large number of animals for prolonged period of time so that more plausible conclusion could be drawn for its future application in animal farms.


Ahmad, I., 2004. Effect of probiotic (protexin) on the growth of broilers with special reference to the small intestinal crypt cells proliferation. M. Phil Thesis, Centre of biotechnology, University of Peshawar.

Alvarez, L.C., E.M. Barrera and E.A. Gonzalez, 1994. Evaluation of growth promoters for broiler chickens. Veterinaria Mexico, 25: 141-144.

Chantsawang, S. and P. Watcharangkul, 1999. Influence of effective microorganisms on the quality of poultry products. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Kyusei Nature Farming, October 23-26, 1997, Sara Buri, Thailand, pp: 133-150.

Effective Microorganisms Research Organization of South Africa, 2003. WWW.EMROSA.SA.

Ergun, A., S. Yalcin and P. Sacakli, 2000. The usage of probiotic and zinc bacitracin in broiler rations. Ankara Universities Veteriner Facultesi Dergisi, 47:271-280.

Gohain, A.K. and D. Sapcota, 1998. Effect of probiotic feeding on the performance of broilers. Ind. J. Poult. Sci., 33: 101-105.

Halima, H., F.W.C. Neser, A. De-Kock and E. Van Marle-Köster, 2009. Study on the genetic diversity of native chickens in northwest Ethiopia using microsatellite markers. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 8: 1347-1353.

Higgins, J.P., S.E. Higgins, V. Salvador, A.D. Wolfenden, G. Tellez and B.M. Hargis, 2007. Temporal effects of lactic acid bacteria probiotic culture on Salmonellain neonatal broilers. Poult. Sci., 86: (in press).

Jagdish, P. and A.K. Sen, 1993. Effect of different growth promoters on the performance of broilers. Poult. Advisory, 26: 49-51.

Kumprechtova, D., P. Zobac and I. Kumprecht, 2000. The effect of Sacchromyces cervisiae SC47 on chicken broiler performance and nitrogen output. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 45: 169-177.

Mohit, A.H., S.A. Hosseini, H. Lotfollahian and F. Shariatmadari, 2007. Effects of probiotics, yeast, vitamin E and vitamin C supplements on performance and immune response of laying hen during high environmental temperature. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 6: 895-900.

Negussie, D., 1999. Evaluation of the performance of local, Rod Island Red and Fayuomi breeds chicken under different management regimes in the highlands of Ethiopia. M.Sc. Thesis, Swedish University of Agriculture Sciences, Uppsala.

Panda, A.K., M.R. Reddy, S.V.R. Rao, M.V.L.N. Raju and N.K. Praharaj, 2000. Growth, carcass characteristics, immunocompetence and response to Escherichia coli of broilers fed diets with various levels of probiotic. Archive fur Geflugelikunde, 64: 152-156.

Patidar, S.K. and J.B. Prajapati, 1999. Effect of feeding Lactobacilli on serum antibody titer and faecal microflora in chicks. Microbiologic Aliments Nutr.,17: 145-154.

Safalaoh, A.C.L., 2006. Body weight gain, dressing percentage, abdominal fat and serum cholesterol of broilers supplemented with a microbial preparation. Afr. On Line J. Food, Agric. Nutr. Dev., 6: 1-10.

Samanta, M. and P. Biswas, 1995. Effect of feeding probiotic and lactic acid on the performance of broiler. In. J. Poult. Sci., 30: 145-147.

SAS software, 2000. version. 8. SAS Institute Incorporated. North Carolina.

Silva, E.N., A.S. Teixeira, A.G. Bertechini, C.L. Ferreira and B.G. Ventura, 2000. Ciencia e Agrotecnologia. 24: Ed. Especial, 224-232.

Tadelle, D., 2003. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of local chicken ecotypes in Ethiopia, Ph.D. Dissertation, Der Humboldt-University Berlin, pp: 2-208.

Tadelle, D. and B. Ogle, 2001. Nutritional status of village poultry in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 33: 521-537.

Vicente, J.L., L. Aviña, A. Torres-Rodriguez, B. Hargis and G. Tellez, 2007. Effect of a Lactobacillus sp.-based probiotic culture product on broiler chicks performance under commercial conditions. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 6: 154-156.

Yoruk, M.A., M. Gul, A. Hayirli and M. Macit, 2004. The effects of supplementation of humate and probiotic on egg production and quality parameters during the late laying period in hens. Poult. Sci., 83: 84-88.

ZuAnon, J.A., S. Fonseca, H.S. Rostagno, M. Almeida and M. Silva, 1998. Effects of growth promoters on broiler chicken performance. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 27: 999-1005.